... and some of you that have played the various editions enlighten me if I'm incorrect...
but haven't there always been "lame" units and such that were good, then got nerfed, then whatever... and I get that. Those insect things from Tau armies come to mind. But I guess my point is that they were OPTIONS and could be played. Because they had rules. Sure, maybe no one took them but if the one person wanted to do it, so be it. They could.
And if Carnac's prognostication comes true and everything gets primaris-ized, then they literally are right back where they started kind of. Folks will proxy firstborn for Primaris that are versions of what was discontinued, save tournament play. So don't think GW can really make the "same" models.
In the newest Dawn of Fire novel the author kind of hints at the "dwindling amounts" of first born. But then you also have all the Fallen coming together via the Lion, etc. so it's just kinda puzzling to me.
Agree with Ish's point about tough spot to be in. And I get the bloat comments, I do. But that was also kind of the situation for older versions when you factored in the Forge World stuff as well, wasn't it? I've yet to see a Fire Raptor listed in any 40k rulesets save the Forge World stuff, etc. So just kind of wondering if GW is also going through changes internally wherein they feel they need to "reset" or something.
I was initially drawn in due to the lore. I gamed and then went competitively, then life so the long break. But continued with the lore. And the purchases. And sometimes a dalliance here or there with painting ha ha. But I don't know how psyched I can get to dump a large amount of money on the "new" stuff and hope that the cycle doesn't continue in the near future.
Appreciate folks not bashing me for just meandering with my thoughts