HeroZero 160 Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 Chaos and imperium are valid soup keywords again in 9th correct? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ish 5,696 Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 1 hour ago, HeroZero said: Chaos and imperium are valid soup keywords again in 9th correct? Yes and no; Under the general rules, for a army to count as Battle-forged they must all have a Faction keyword in common. However, the Grand Tournament 2020 rules (and presumably all the other Matched Play systems [I haven’t read them]) they specifically state that this keyword cannot be CHAOS, IMPERIUM, AELDARI, YNNARI or TYRANIDS. It’s basically an unwritten rule that unless you and your opponent specifically say otherwise, everyone assumes you’re using the Matched Play rules. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Inquisitor66 685 Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 You can still have multiple detachments that only share imperium, chaos etc... just like 8th. necrontyr 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ish 5,696 Posted December 28, 2020 Report Share Posted December 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Inquisitor66 said: You can still have multiple detachments that only share imperium, chaos etc... just like 8th. Ah, you’re right, I should have distinguished between Detachment and Army in my post. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lyraeus 1,046 Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 You do have to spend the CP per detachment Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sgt. Rock 1,059 Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 16 minutes ago, Lyraeus said: You do have to spend the CP per detachment Doesn't go far enough, says I! I say we all go back to the original Force Organization chart. None of these silly "detachments" or "keywords" to muck about with. You wanna play Space Marines? Play 'em. You wanna mix in some Imperial Guard? Tough nuts! Damn kids these days with their "soup"... soup is for eating, not 40k! Blustorm 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lyraeus 1,046 Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 1 minute ago, Sgt. Rock said: Doesn't go far enough, says I! I say we all go back to the original Force Organization chart. None of these silly "detachments" or "keywords" to muck about with. You wanna play Space Marines? Play 'em. You wanna mix in some Imperial Guard? Tough nuts! Damn kids these days with their "soup"... soup is for eating, not 40k! Hahaha I remember the last time we had this argument. Alas CP is a precious resource and some armies actually lose a lot if everything is not from the same group. I think marines lose doctrines or super doctrines, sisters of battle lose their Rites, so GW is going that way Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ish 5,696 Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 1 hour ago, Sgt. Rock said: I say we all go back to the original Force Organization chart. “Original” Force Organization chart, he says. Harrumph! In the good old days, we had percentages of our points allotted to each unit type and had to do maths to figure it out. None of these newfangled charts you whipper snappers have. If you wanted to play Space Marines you got: Characters 50% Squads 25%+ Support 50% Oh, and Support units could be drawn from any Space Marine, Imperial Guard, Imperial Agents, Squats, or Eldar (sans Avatar) codices. Blustorm 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Inquisitor66 685 Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 Pshaww....back in my day we didn't have all these fancy FACTIONS and UNITS, we had X and we had O and we bloody liked it! PourSpelur, Salty Monkey and Blustorm 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Munkie 1,990 Posted January 2 Report Share Posted January 2 On 12/31/2020 at 7:00 AM, Inquisitor66 said: Pshaww....back in my day we didn't have all these fancy FACTIONS and UNITS, we had X and we had O and we bloody liked it! Now we were too poor, and we had to eat all our Xs, we had nothing but Os! And that's how we invented the game of checkers. Lyraeus and PourSpelur 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PourSpelur 2,071 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 Oooh, fancy lad with his access to O's. When I was a lad we were too poor for O's. We were just p__r. Munkie and Blustorm 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HeroZero 160 Posted January 6 Author Report Share Posted January 6 You privileged few with your "youth" and "childhoods" in my day we were expected to work the day you were weaned and like it!. We were so p**r that the concept of letters was too expensive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ish 5,696 Posted January 6 Report Share Posted January 6 Weaned! Luxury! When I was an infant, I was expected to absorb nutrients from the soil. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Munkie 1,990 Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 On 1/6/2021 at 3:28 PM, Ish said: Weaned! Luxury! When I was an infant, I was expected to absorb nutrients from the soil. Soil?! Nutrients?! We were raised on dirt! The stuff snobs like you tossed away like trash once you'd absorbed all that you could! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ish 5,696 Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 I said I was expected to absorb nutrients from the soil, I didn’t say I was able to. The Man stole all our dirt, man. We just had sand! PourSpelur and Munkie 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Frowbakk 440 Posted January 8 Report Share Posted January 8 Sand? You were lucky. All of my family, trying to get by on what we could find at the bottom of the pothole in the middle of the road where all 287 of us lived. We all dreamed of one day having even one GRAIN of sand to share between us, let alone the rampant excess of having more than that? Unthinkable. We had our pothole, and we were thankful. PourSpelur 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HeroZero 160 Posted January 9 Author Report Share Posted January 9 You had a PotHole? You bourgeoisie oppressor! We had to rent out a hole from people like you. We traded away children to you for the privilege of that hole! Poor timmy... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ish 5,696 Posted January 9 Report Share Posted January 9 Timmy had a name? Well, pardon me while I genuflect and tip my hat. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.