Brother Glacius Posted May 12, 2014 Report Share Posted May 12, 2014 Wow, this is a tough one to review. If you just sit and watch it, with your brain turned off, it is probably a 7, maybe even an 8. But as soon as you start to reflect on the movie, then it drops to about a 5. I can safely say that after the first Amazing Spider-Man, I was hyped to see this one. I am not so hyped to see SM3. They have a great spider-man. Garfield was awesome. The story and places they took it...not so great. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroZero Posted May 12, 2014 Report Share Posted May 12, 2014 I've had more enjoyable hemorrhoids than this pile of dreck. Ghost rider was better, hell Elektra was better this movie is on par with catwoman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pretre Posted May 12, 2014 Report Share Posted May 12, 2014 I wasn't a fan of the first one either. I've had more enjoyable hemorrhoids than this pile of dreck. Ghost rider was better, hell Elektra was better this movie is on par with catwoman. Hyperbole is literally the worst thing in existence, however. ;) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andozane Posted May 12, 2014 Report Share Posted May 12, 2014 I enjoyed it...but yeah, definitely had to turn my brain off. Still better than the Raimi Spider Man 3 :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiccus Posted May 13, 2014 Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 6 out of 10 with a heavy leaning towards a 5. The first one was great. This was just an annoying teen movie. They really made it clear who they wanted to market it to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dashneeb Posted May 13, 2014 Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 I thought it was an OK movie until the last half hour or so. Obviously, the buildup was there, and I felt Electro was almost a throw away villain. When I heard a reviewer say that he could have been discharged (no pun intended) and not changed the film much, it was very true. However, much like say, Iron Man 3, the movie should have been titled Peter Parker with the occasional Spider Man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckman Posted May 13, 2014 Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 To be honest, I am not a fan of Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker. The first Amazing Spider Man was not bad; I enjoyed the effects and was honestly happy to see them cover a new villain instead of the Goblin who is iconic but now pretty trite. The problem is that Garfield is much to hip and happenin' to be Peter Parker. Toby McGuire managed that *so* much better. (No arguing, however, that Spiderman 3 sucked rocks. McGwire sucked as Venom.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generalripphook Posted May 13, 2014 Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 Man, I agree...there was so much focus on the day and life of peter parker and not enough spider man stuff...and out of high school?? Where is MJ.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Glacius Posted May 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 Gwen was Peter's first love...MJ didn't really get involved until later. IIRC. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.