Frostitute Posted January 23, 2022 Report Posted January 23, 2022 It is only implemented to keep teams below 1500. Great. Why am i redrafting a player with 2 SPP for 20K more. Who the F|_|CK does this benefit.... Strength teams. Because a 90K elf lineman is so worth keeping on my roster. Just because I have 2 SPP on a lineman doesn't mean S|-|it. Honestly redrafting should be an optional house rule. '' 1 Quote
Burk Posted January 23, 2022 Report Posted January 23, 2022 hate when I agree with Frosty....and im playing a strength team that can be pretty close to matching my current roster Quote
Weav Posted January 24, 2022 Report Posted January 24, 2022 Your concerns are heard and understood. We are redrafting this season to see how it works in both the rules and Tourplay. This topic is open to discussion for future seasons. 1 Quote
scotthartman Posted January 31, 2022 Report Posted January 31, 2022 On 1/22/2022 at 10:45 PM, Frostitute said: It is only implemented to keep teams below 1500. Great. Why am i redrafting a player with 2 SPP for 20K more. Who the F|_|CK does this benefit.... Strength teams. Because a 90K elf lineman is so worth keeping on my roster. Just because I have 2 SPP on a lineman doesn't mean S|-|it. Honestly redrafting should be an optional house rule. '' all rules are optional house rules 1 Quote
Teturact Posted January 31, 2022 Report Posted January 31, 2022 I think they generally work pretty well. There are some things that can be done to play around with it like changing the agent fees base rate, the years rate, have a delay on years adding cost, eliminate the years experience rate and change it to an experience level (ie veteran, rising star and so on) rate. It is frustrating to have to dump half of your team for rookies but I think it keeps it interesting and possible for new teams to compete. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.