Jump to content

Steel Angel

Members
  • Posts

    985
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Steel Angel

  1. I got the starter, b-wing, x-wing,tie advanced, Hwk, and a bomber $75 dollars. ebay-warstore.

     

    now need to find a group to come over and play lol.

     

    So I just learned something else about initial buy in. Some ships include upgrades that others do not. I wanted push the limit, so I had to buy an a-wing to get it for example. Not a big deal, but as you get into the game more, you may find other things like shield upgrades (falcon and slave I) and such might be useful.

     

    Not a deal breaker, but just for those looking to fine tune lists.

     

    and then you trade with friends for ships and cards they want to trade. Easy as pie.....Hmmm pie

  2. It's useful locally. I can't make you- or anyone else- use it, but more than a couple of other people on the blog seemed appreciative that there was a compiled list of questions and answers to resolve them. Be honest, how many of those were you actually aware of and have a specific resolution to?

     

    Honest knew about most of them anyone who visits here,Dakka Dakka ,B&C...ect ect will know about them and know for everyone who has an answer one will disagree.

     

    Not say an Faq is not need that's fine. Someones got to make the call on unclear rules.

     

    What I am saying is the part where people start changing the rules and tell other players what they can and can not take just because someone doesn't like it is the problem.

     

     

    In the end even in a tournament I rather lose 3 times while playing, then not be playing at all. So  let them bring that nasty Sreamerstar or your Taudar or the big IK ect ect in the end I got to play. but count on it when I get home I will try and come up with tactics to beat them next time, and that just gives me more fun.

  3. Thats my point. What good is an faq or errata then?

     

    If all it boils down is cause I say so if you want to play here.

     

    if you want to make anything that means anything people,stores,groups need to get together to make it.

     

    till then its just 10 different people making up ten different house rules.

     

    which in the end means you still get two players practicing for two different tournaments still fighting over rules.

  4.  

     

    However, you seem to think otherwise, so I would ask you what you think should be done. Offer me a "fix" for Escalation that deals with all of the problem units and isn't unreasonably complex.

     

     

    Well I'm not trying to make a rule set that is not meant for tournament play in to one. But if i was i would try make the missions the leveling field not change the armies.

     

    Another way to go is just change shooting ST D weapons to allow cover and inv. save but disallow any kind of reroll to a save or special ability like feel no pain or reanimate or eternal warrior.  Still makes them powerful but not god like. St D in cc is diff. cause there has all ways been those kind of CC weapons in one form or another.

  5. Personally I think y'all are getting on a slippy slop. Come up with an Faq is one thing for confusing rules, But but when you start saying " hey you can't play this perfectly legal unit because we think it's to powerful " is something else. Where do you start and where do you stop? Some are worried IK will be op so ban them. Yet Tau have been proven time and again to have the potential to be OP or Eldar or Taudar. And what is the common response " there totally legal  armies." But the problem is so is half the stuff y'all are debating.

     

    See weather the powers that be know this or not. What they choose for rules at tournaments transfers over to everyday normal games. It may not be what they mean to happen but it does especially in Pugs.

     

    Come up with away to deal with it,beside the lazy man "just ban it"

     

     

    Sorry just my two cents.

×
×
  • Create New...