Jump to content

ITS 2016


Jay

Recommended Posts

That's what I'm asking. The wording could be clearer. Seems like it may or may not be possible for a player to deny OP by tailoring a list with fewer possible Lt's.

The only restriction on naming replacement LTs is in the Loss of Lieutenant rule.  Per the scenario, Loss of Lieutenant does not apply, hence no restrictions.

SCENARIO SPECIAL RULES

REINFORCED TACTICAL LINK

In this scenario the rule Loss of Lieutenant does not apply.

In this mission, the identity of the Lieutenant is always Public Information.

If the player lacks a Lieutenant during the Tactical Phase of the Active Turn because this trooper was not deployed or because it is in an Isolated or a Null state (Unconscious, Dead, Sepsitorized…), then the player must name a new Lieutenant, without Order expenditure. The identity of this new Lieutenant is also Public Information.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...