I've been in a modeling lull. My enthusiasm for these games is driven by what pet project has me obsessed, and lately I haven't had one.
I've always been a huge WWI history buff - Flanders Fields, etc. A long while back I collected some steel legion, death korp, and various third-party long coat troops. They've been on my "to do" list for a while. I toyed with creating a trench board, etc. Always seemed like a good idea, but a little out there. Then I read stronghold assault….
I'm captivated by creating an army where the terrain and board is the heart of the army itself. The fortifications are as much a part of the army, it's painting style and how it plays, as the little men themselves. But the gauge of a good idea is whether it would be fun to be across the table from.
So I'm curious what people would think if at a friendly event, say OFCC, if you faced an army that was 700-800 pts in fortifications, i.e., nearly 50% of the total, some emplaced artillery like heavy mortars and thudd guns, maybe a tank bunkered down, and greatcoat troops scurrying along the muddy trenches? Would that much fortification sour you? Would you feel that playing such a static and unmoving army was a wasted round? Or would it be something different and fun to play against?