Jump to content

ClassicFlava

Members
  • Posts

    878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ClassicFlava

  1. also if a character is already in base to base he cannot make way. Say you wanted to move him around in the front rank to be in base to base with a specific model you could only do it with a combat reform.
  2. I like that it has a learning to curve to play. Leaves more room for development as a player. Also seeing how well the End of Times book has sold tells me the game is not in decline, but instead starting an upswing. Any large scale battle game is going to be more expensive to play because you need more models. Nothing you can do about that but lower prices. I think the new wood elf stuff sold well too. Not sure about Oregon, but over the last year Warhammer is making quite a comeback here in the Seattle area.
  3. I actually strongly disagree that fantasy needs an overhaul. I think it needs a few tweeks here and there, but the large scale is what draws me towards fantasy and I would hate to see that changed. As for consolidating armies I would love to see chaos go back to being combined instead of 3 books. Most people I have talked to say the new edition of 40k is pretty bad so I am hoping they don't go that direction with fantasy. Other than cost to play what are your reasons for thinking fantasy needs an overhaul?
  4. Yeah I was counting you as one of the paid Murphyslawyer. There is one guy waiting for his tuition reimbursement for school. As soon as he gets it he will pay. That may have already happened...not sure
  5. Team dimensional cascade forum team has at least 3 out of 4 paid. Possibly 4.
  6. I prefer anywhere between 2500 and 2999. I fell that when games are smaller you see less army diversity. When you start getting above 3000 games just take too long IMO.
  7. Looking to trade some ripper bits for terradon bits (heads and feet). Anyone have some spare?
  8. spot has been filled by murphys lawyer
  9. Turns out nater has already been claimed. Anyone else looking for a team? We currently have skaven, ogres, and lizardmen
  10. So I just had a player drop :-(. We don't have any dwarves and nater has been vouched for so if he wants to join the dimensional cascade forum team he is more than welcome
  11. Alright so here is our confirmed team roster. Just got it figured out today (had a guy bail last minute) Dimensional Cascade Forum Ryan Munsell(captain): Lizardmen Jonathan Beatty: Empire Jesse Hjelmstead: Skaven Garrett Mercier: Ogres
  12. If you are playing s shooty WE list you might not want to engage until turn 3 or 4 with some of your units. it gives you a use for it before you engage the enemy. also he will kill cavalry in droves and can easily kill a two wound mage a turn. I am not saying to build a list around it, but it is an interesting idea that i think i could find room for in my list in a larger pt value game. At 2500 i just kind make room
  13. If you are running beasts a waystalker with bow of Loren could be amazing if you cast savage beast on it.
  14. i think you would be fine either way. Monsters are not that powerful in the current rules. You should take double carnosaur tho :-). That would look amazing on the tabletop
  15. if you charge them they dont overrun. They have to charge you.
  16. If they give you a chariot charge on the wild riders they have made a huge error. Move 9 fast cav easily out maneuver move 7 chariot
  17. They actually need 3's as they are str 5 on the charge. A unit of 6 wild riders throws out nineteen WS 5 str 5 attacks that reroll misses. It also throws out twelve str 4 attacks. That will kill A LOT of beastmen. They won't charge till they have thinned put the unit enough with shooting. They might even charge you with two units of 6 which should kill almost 30 gor/bestigor. Having no shooting to thin out the wild rider units is a death sentence
  18. I hadn't seen the post the forums yet but the email does say august 15th. I am assuming august 1st is the date
  19. its august 15th. I got an email from AgentP today stating that.
  20. Beastmen dont have any shooting to thin out the wild rider units before they make it into combat. The wood elves are able to engage the beastmen on their terms as the beastmen have to march across the board to engage the wood elves.
  21. actually i am pretty sure the new wood elves are a bad matchup for beastmen. Until they get a new book atleast
×
×
  • Create New...