Jump to content

Circular Debates over Assault Rules - Was: New C:SM Stuff


pretre

Recommended Posts

Guest Mr. Bigglesworth

I think mcs suffer the most as they are most likely to weather the storm. And a lot of mcs have template weapons and lose their wall of death overwatch protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it doesnt have a ld stat it does not take test. So it cant fail or pass.

 

This is why dreads loved mindshackle scarbs

I thought it was true, but couldn't find it.

 

EDIT: Bottom right of page 78, yeah, vehicles simply don't test. No mention about auto-passing, they just don't test.

 

On a funny side note, in last paragraph of the "assault results" section, says non-Walker vehicles can actually win assaults and cause enemy models to flee, if they can somehow score better in the assault phase.... Maybe a banner? I gotta try this one now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it doesnt have a ld stat it does not take test. So it cant fail or pass.

 

This is why dreads loved mindshackle scarbs

Agh, I was wrong. They aren't fearless.

 

"Vehicles, Leadership and Morale

It is assumed, in all cases, that the crew’s faith in their vehicle, and its considerable
armour plating, is absolute. Therefore, vehicles never take Morale checks or Leadership
tests. Any occasional lapses that do occur are represented by Crew Shaken and Crew
Stunned results on the Vehicle Damage table."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Agh, I was wrong. They aren't fearless.

 

"Vehicles, Leadership and Morale

It is assumed, in all cases, that the crew’s faith in their vehicle, and its considerable
armour plating, is absolute. Therefore, vehicles never take Morale checks or Leadership
tests. Any occasional lapses that do occur are represented by Crew Shaken and Crew
Stunned results on the Vehicle Damage table."

 

Lol. made the same miskake too, though I beat you in posting it by 1 whole minute..... :laugh:

 

 

I thought it was true, but couldn't find it.

 

EDIT: Bottom right of page 78, yeah, vehicles simply don't test. No mention about auto-passing, they just don't test.

 

On a funny side note, in last paragraph of the "assault results" section, says non-Walker vehicles can actually win assaults and cause enemy models to flee, if they can somehow score better in the assault phase.... Maybe a banner? I gotta try this one now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, question I had:

 

Demi-companies award a use of the Tactical doctrine. The Gladius formation allows sub-formation rules while adding its own.

 

So if I have 2 demi-companies in a battle company, do I have 1 Assault 2 Tactical 1 Devastator doctrine, or do I have 1 assault 3 Tactical 1 Devastator (that's one per demi-company). Each one, by the wording, affects _all_ demi-companies you purchase.

 

If so, Ultramines would get a whopping 2-4-2. That's . .vaguely obscene in my list.

 

If you have one or more Demi-Companies, you get one extra use of Tactical Doctrine. Same with the extra uses of all three from the Gladius; if you've got two Gladius Formations, that's still only one extra use of each.

 

Still puts an Ultramarine Gladius at 2-3-2, which is pretty scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Pretre is correct about ICs that join unit would charge too. If we all agree ICs can join a unit in that formation. then by the rules he would have to charge too.

 

Models in the formation gain its bonuses, including the ability to assault the turn they arrive from reserve.

 

ICs that join a unit are part of that unit, but do not automatically gain the unit's rules unless stated otherwise. (For example, joining an IC to a squad that has Furious Charge from a formation does not automatically give that IC Furious Charge.)

 

If some models in a unit are able to assault but others are not, the unit is unable to assault (because, unlike shooting and moving, a whole unit makes an assault, not just parts of it.)

 

Q.E.D. a unit from the formation with an IC joined to it cannot launch an assault.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abusepuppy I understand that logic but those are specifically USRs which need to explicitly say that the rule is passed on to the squad. In this case it is a formation bonus to the unit not a USR granted by the formation.

Got a quote for this one? Like where it says Universal Special Rules instead of just Special Rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See that the grey area. Its not a unit special rule its a formation special rule that is given to anyone in that unit that is a part of it. If a IC joins that unit then he is part of that unit that gets a special rule from a formation.

 

 

but like I said this is open to much debate. I can not find anywhere that said ICs that join formations do not get formation special rules only about unit special rules.

 

Shrug just my .75 cents - inflation= 2 cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading the formation it is pretty specific on who gets the charge from reserves...

 

Assault squads from this formation. It isn't "units of" or "consisting of" or is very specifically assault squads. No mention of the unit only the squad from the formation. I'm going worth abuse puppy nothing there gives the rule to the attached character or even the whole unit, just the assault squad itself gets the rule which would then trigger it as a special rule which the IC doesn't specifically get so no fancy reserve charging character shenanigans.

 

My two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See that the grey area. Its not a unit special rule its a formation special rule that is given to anyone in that unit that is a part of it. If a IC joins that unit then he is part of that unit that gets a special rule from a formation.

 

 

but like I said this is open to much debate. I can not find anywhere that said ICs that join formations do not get formation special rules only about unit special rules.

 

Shrug just my .75 cents - inflation= 2 cents

 

As I said: only models that are in a formation gain the formation's benefits. I don't really see how you can argue otherwise; if my formation gives twin-linked to all its units, having a squad ride inside a tank does not make the tank twin-linked because it is not a part of the formation, nor is an IC that joined the squad. Joining a squad that is in the formation does not make you part of the formation- otherwise you would have a unit that was part of, say, the Skyhammer formation as well as a Combined Arms Detachment, which is illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a different note, I was flipping through the pages of shiny painted models, and I don't recognize that Terminator Captain on Pg.106. Was he limited edition, or is that a conversion, or might it be an hint at another upcoming release?

He's the cap from Strike Force Ultra.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said: only models that are in a formation gain the formation's benefits. I don't really see how you can argue otherwise; if my formation gives twin-linked to all its units, having a squad ride inside a tank does not make the tank twin-linked because it is not a part of the formation, nor is an IC that joined the squad. Joining a squad that is in the formation does not make you part of the formation- otherwise you would have a unit that was part of, say, the Skyhammer formation as well as a Combined Arms Detachment, which is illegal.

I'll drop this debate sept for one thing in your example a tank dedicated or not is never considered part of the unit.

 

But this topic is old time to move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said: only models that are in a formation gain the formation's benefits. I don't really see how you can argue otherwise; if my formation gives twin-linked to all its units, having a squad ride inside a tank does not make the tank twin-linked because it is not a part of the formation, nor is an IC that joined the squad. Joining a squad that is in the formation does not make you part of the formation- otherwise you would have a unit that was part of, say, the Skyhammer formation as well as a Combined Arms Detachment, which is illegal.

Counterpoint: The IC doesn't get/need the special rules. Your example, all units in a formation get twin-linked. An IC joins a unit from that formation. Does the unit still get twin-linked? Yes. The unit does not lose the special rule because an IC is part of the unit. The unit still benefits from the formation's benefits. 

 

Also, transport vs IC is a bad comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...