-
Content Count
302 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Tamwulf last won the day on November 30 2016
Tamwulf had the most liked content!
About Tamwulf

-
Rank
Maniac
- Birthday 11/18/1971
Recent Profile Visitors
595 profile views
-
Salty Monkey reacted to a post in a topic: Thursday 04/22 - Ordo Fanaticus game night @wow
-
Opps, forgot to post here. I'm planning on showing up for a Crusade game! Can do up to 1100 points with Adeptus Custodies. Still learning the nuances of 9th edition.
-
Salty Monkey reacted to a post in a topic: Open Crusade! 2021
-
Imperator missionis bellum of the Adeptus Custodies are ready to enforce the Emperor's Will! Gonna be a wild and crazy ride, that's for sure.
-
Lyraeus reacted to a post in a topic: 04/13/2021 Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 5p - 8p
-
Weav reacted to a post in a topic: 04/13/2021 Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 5p - 8p
-
04/13/2021 Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 5p - 8p
Tamwulf replied to Weav's topic in Game Night
I'm looking for a 40K game. Any takers? -
Tamwulf reacted to a post in a topic: Thursday - 4/1/21 - Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 4p -8p
-
Thursday - 4/1/21 - Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 4p -8p
Tamwulf replied to ninefinger's topic in Game Night
It looks like I have no takers on a game so please remove my name from the list. Maybe next week! -
Blustorm reacted to a post in a topic: Thursday - 4/1/21 - Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 4p -8p
-
Thursday - 4/1/21 - Ordo Fanaticus Game Night at W.O.W. 4p -8p
Tamwulf replied to ninefinger's topic in Game Night
I'm looking for a 40K game on Thursday! My Ultramarines. Would like 1,500 to 2,000, but can do lower or a bit more. Really rusty, need to get back into the swing of things. Not looking for a face stomp/competitive game. More like a "Remember how to play this game?" -
Could it be argued that people can pay for Battlescribe (the non-add version), then download the repositories that and use Battlescribe for making an army list, and because Battlescribe is making money from that, it's in violation of intellectual property rights? Happens all the time in the software industry. You can't make any app on the Google Play store or Apple's App store that makes money without giving 30% of that money to them. I really think Battlescribe's days are numbered. 😞
-
Salty Monkey reacted to a post in a topic: BACK ON - JEFF IS THERE! see last post 9/8 - Ordo Game night at WoW- Tuesday 4:00-8:00
-
Blustorm reacted to a post in a topic: House of Chains - lite review
-
Goonhammer might be more positive, but doesn't touch on any of the mistakes found in the book. They all seem to be proof reading errors. Even so, which cost do you use for the Phyrr Cat? Do you have Power Axes in your gang, even though they can't buy them? I guess Clan Escher raided an ammo bunker and that's why all their Bolters are now Ammo 4+? These are some serious issues for a Gang. The fluff was good, artwork was good. Overall layout was good, but when it came to actual rules, GW really dropped the ball here. What do you do in a case like this? "Have a conversation with your opponen
-
Blustorm reacted to a post in a topic: House of Chains - lite review
-
Taken from Dakka Dakka: https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/1140/784965.page
-
Tamwulf reacted to a post in a topic: Ordo Fanaticus Crusade Season 1 - Astaroda Conflict
-
andozane reacted to a post in a topic: Indomitus Assembly Helper
-
Romans832 reacted to a post in a topic: Indomitus Assembly Helper
-
Found this on Facebook. I'm sure it'll help! The models are color coded on the srpues to help in assembly.
-
The problem is Android SDK is in Java, and Apple can use Java, but it's mainly developed in Swift (which is Java-like, but handles things very differently). They can both use Objective C, and they use the same Data Bases, but the way it processes those DB's are very different. The operating systems in Android and iOS are VERY different in how they handle code. You can't just "port over" Android code into XCode and then let the interpreter compile into Swift and... it just doesn't work that way. They basically have to make two Apps or it will be nothing but bugs, problems, and DB errors all the
-
Yeah, I'm not sure HOW they are going to get this app on iPhone. Apple are tyrants about apps, requiring full access to the app for a very lengthy and technical approval process. Then, every time the app requires an update, it has to go through the entire process again. I have a feeling the hang up is GW trying to negotiate the fees. See, if an app is "free", then the creator is charged a one time fee to apply to have the App put on the store. If the app has micro-transactions or a monthly fee, Apple gets a percentage of that fee- and it's a hefty 15%-30% depending on the type and amount.
-
I was all hyped about taking the Banner of Macragge Inviolate on the new Bladeguard Ancient for my Ultramarines until I read that the Relic is for Ancients only. The Bladeguard Ancient's +1 to hit for Bladeguard Units is NOT tied to his standard. With the UM banner, they would have been +1 attack, +1 to hit, autopass morale. But he has the keyword "Bladeguard Ancient" which is annoying. I'm thinking I'll probably just use the Primaris Ancient with UM Banner, Victrix Honor Guard, and the Bladeguard Captain as a nice little CC unit. In an Impulsor I think. Yeah, looking like I'll be making some
-
I'm interested, and thinking Imperial Fists. Time for a new Space Marine army!
-
New to being a Runner of Leagues, Help wanted
Tamwulf replied to Lyraeus's topic in Warhammer 40,000
Just keep it simple. Either go with all PL, or points, but not both. Isn't the original Crusade Rules built around Power Level? And allowing a "pool" of models for players to create a list from just rewards the players that already have an army as they'll just pick the best units right off the bat. Allowing players, especially new players, a Power Level army makes army creation much, much easier, and allows limited customization for a unit from game to game. It's always a nightmare trying to "validate" an army list. The player used an out of date publication, they didn't check the FAQ/Errata,