Jump to content

Random Thought Thread


InfestedKerrigan

Recommended Posts

This is a random thought generated by the Realm of Chaos:

There is no such thing as an alpha wolf. That theory has been long debunked (by the author who originally proposed it no less). What he thought he observed of a larger more aggressive male dominating over subservient males was just a pack consisting of a mated couple and their pups. Larger wolves telling smaller wolves what to do, not to exert social dominance, but because parents teach their young how to operate in the world.

No zoologist or with wolf enthusiast gives the idea of alpha males any credence. It is, however, still used an effective way to explain away someone's bad behavior as evidence they're socially superior.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Munkie said:

This is a random thought generated by the Realm of Chaos:

There is no such thing as an alpha wolf. That theory has been long debunked (by the author who originally proposed it no less). What he thought he observed of a larger more aggressive male dominating over subservient males was just a pack consisting of a mated couple and their pups. Larger wolves telling smaller wolves what to do, not to exert social dominance, but because parents teach their young how to operate in the world.

No zoologist or with wolf enthusiast gives the idea of alpha males any credence. It is, however, still used an effective way to explain away someone's bad behavior as evidence they're socially superior.

The author even tried to stop publication of his own book.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Munkie said:

Yup. It's just a theory people wish was real so much that they refuse to let it die.

It’s also something most people only ever heard second-hand (or even further removed) like in a Discovery Channel show or in some sort of fictional story about wolves. Since most people don’t really have any reason to study deeply into the topic, it sounds pretty plausible, and they keep hearing references to it… They just assume it must be true. It’s likely a variant of the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effects

Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them. In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know. — Michael Crichton

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...